SettleGrid is running a public x402 facilitator

We're running a public x402 facilitator at facilitator.settlegrid.ai. Anyone shipping an x402-protected MCP server, REST endpoint, or agent service can point their settlement layer at it without standing up a gas wallet, an RPC subscription, or a signature- verification stack of their own.

This is partly a thing we needed and partly a thing the protocol needed. Coinbase's x402 spec turns HTTP 402 Payment Required into a real settlement primitive: a tool returns 402 with a payment offer, the buyer's client signs an EIP-3009 authorization, and a facilitator — a third party with a funded wallet and the verification logic — submits the on-chain transfer. The protocol is healthier when more independent facilitators run the same endpoints. Nevermined operates one too. So does Coinbase. Now so do we.

Endpoints#

All three required by the x402 v2 facilitator spec are live on day one:

• POST /v1/verify — validate a payment payload (signature, nonce, balance, time window) without settling. Use this when your tool wants to confirm a payment is good before doing the expensive work the buyer paid for.
• POST /v1/settle — verify, then submit the on-chain transfer via our gas wallet. Idempotent: same payload returns the same txHash for 24 hours, so retries don't double-charge.
• GET /v1/supported — capabilities envelope (schemes, networks, extensions). Read this first when your tool starts up; cache the result.

Curl examples and the request/response shapes are at settlegrid.ai/protocols/x402/facilitator.

What we support on day one#

• Base mainnet (CAIP-2: eip155:8453). USDC at 0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913.
• Base Sepolia (CAIP-2: eip155:84532). USDC at 0x036CbD53842c5426634e7929541eC2318f3dCF7e.

That's it. Two networks. The internal SettleGrid kernel has plumbing for more, but the public facilitator only advertises networks I've personally end-to-end-settled on outside our dev environment. If you want Ethereum mainnet, Optimism, Arbitrum, or Polygon, file an issue and we'll prioritize against demand. The supported list is a guarantee, not a roadmap.

The exact scheme (EIP-3009 transferWithAuthorization) is the production path. The upto scheme (Permit2-based, useful for metered usage where the final amount is computed at settlement time) is in beta — verify works, settle returns a 400 UNSUPPORTED_SCHEME until I've shipped the Permit2 wallet integration and tested it against a real flow. Don't build production traffic on upto yet.

How it works under the hood#

The route at /v1/verify calls into our existing settlement module (apps/web/src/lib/settlement/x402) — the same code path that powers the internal SDK adapter. Verify checks the signature, nonce state, balance, and validBefore window via a viem public client. Settle adds transaction submission via a viem wallet client; on success, we cache the result keyed on the SHA-256 of the payment payload in Redis with a 24-hour TTL. Hitting the same payload twice returns the cached txHash without burning gas a second time. Rate limiting is per IP, per endpoint. No facilitator auth on either side — public means public.

Why a third public facilitator#

Nevermined and Coinbase already operate facilitators, and both work fine. Adding a third is a community contribution, not a competition. Three reasons to use ours:

1. Geographic and provider diversity. Three independent facilitators on three different cloud providers (Vercel, Coinbase's infra, Nevermined's) means a single incident at any one of them doesn't dark the protocol for everyone.
2. Source-available implementation. All the verification and settlement code is in the SettleGrid monorepo at github.com/lexwhiting/settlegrid. If something fails on a tricky edge case, you can read the exact line that returned the error.
3. No surprise auth additions. Some facilitator operators reserve the right to require API keys later. Our contract is public-public; if we ever change that we'll announce it 30 days ahead and document the rationale.

If your tool needs lowest-possible latency in a different region or your SDK already pins another provider's URL, keep using what works. The protocol is bigger than any single facilitator — including ours.

If you're picking between SettleGrid and Nevermined more broadly — pricing, protocol breadth, SDK languages, named customers — the side-by-side at settlegrid.ai/compare/nevermined calls out where each is genuinely stronger.

Operational stance#

I'm a solo founder. The facilitator runs on the same Vercel deployment as the rest of the SettleGrid app, so it inherits the same uptime profile and the same incident-response paths. Open issues with the facilitator label show up in our launch-week war room dashboard. For an outage report, email founder@settlegrid.ai — that's faster than the issue tracker for time-sensitive problems.

Two things I'm explicit about:

• The gas wallet is finite. If you push enough volume to drain the wallet faster than I can refill it, settlement will start returning 500 SETTLEMENT_FAILED until I top up. There is no auto-refill from a treasury account today; that's coming. In the meantime, the wallet balance is on the /protocols/x402/facilitator page (planned, not live yet).
• Not yet shipped. Tasks I owe the x402 community: full upto-scheme settlement, automated wallet refill, a status page beyond the GitHub issues label, and country- matched RPC fallback for Base. Coming next, in that order.

What's next#

Try it. Point your tool at https://facilitator.settlegrid.ai, run a settlement on Base Sepolia, and tell me where the round-trip latency or the error messages were worse than what you're using today. I'd rather hear that the response shape needs work than discover it from silence. Issue, email, or @lexwhiting on X — whichever's fastest.

The protocol is healthier with more facilitators in it. Welcome.